FOR2609 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. 

Question 1 In your own words provide your understanding of
the term ���previous consistent statement”. (10) Question 2
Opinion evidence can be crucial in solving the case in court.
Discuss opinion evidence and the exceptions to the general rule
of admissibility. (5) Question 3 The principle of adducing
evidence provides that evidence should be corroborated in court.
Explain how corroboration is done. (5) Question 4 The presiding
officers in criminal courts have the power to adjudicate matters
in court. Such powers can include taking “judicial notice.”
Define and explain the concept “judicial notice”. (5) Question 5
Dialogue outside of court is different from testifying on the
witness stand. In your own words, explain the tendering of
evidence. (5)
Here's a breakdown of each question with concise explanations:
Question 1: Understanding the Term "Previous Consistent
Statement" (10 marks)
A "previous consistent statement" refers to a statement made by
a witness prior to the trial that aligns with their testimony in
court. Generally, such statements are inadmissible because they
are seen as self-serving and repetitive. However, they may
become relevant in specific situations, such as: