1. A behavior analyst is working with a client who has a

history of self-injurious behavior. The behavior analyst

wants to implement a differential reinforcement of

alternative behavior (DRA) procedure to reduce the selfinjury and increase appropriate coping skills. The behavior

analyst has obtained consent from the client and his legal

guardian, and has explained the risks and benefits of the

intervention. However, the behavior analyst is concerned

that the client may experience some initial increase in selfinjury due to extinction burst. What should the behavior

analyst do in this situation?

 a) Implement the DRA procedure as planned and monitor

the client closely for any signs of distress or harm.

 b) Modify the DRA procedure to include a response cost

component, such as removing a preferred item or activity,

for each occurrence of self-injury.

 c) Discontinue the DRA procedure and use a less intrusive

intervention, such as positive reinforcement for absence of

self-injury.

 d) Consult with a supervisor or colleague who has

expertise in treating self-injurious behavior and seek their

input on how to proceed.

 Answer: D. The behavior analyst should consult with a

supervisor or colleague who has expertise in treating selfinjurious behavior and seek their input on how to proceed.

This is consistent with the ethical principle of competence,

which states that behavior analysts should provide services

only within their areas of training and experience, and

should seek consultation or supervision when necessary.