WGU C265 OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT 2 LATEST VERSIONS 2024 CRITICAL THINKING REASON AND EVIDENCE ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 400 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) |ALREADY GRADED A+

1 | P a g e WGU C265 OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT 2 LATEST VERSIONS 2024 CRITICAL THINKING REASON AND EVIDENCE ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 400 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) |ALREADY GRADED A+ WGU C265 OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT VERSION A Which of these terms demonstrate when a conclusion follows from the premises/reasons, and is based off the structure of the argument and not about whether the statement is realistically true? - valid - sound - strong - uncogent - ANSWER- A Valid argument Which of these relies on an argument being valid first, and then also having true premises? 2 | P a g e - valid - sound - strong - cogent - ANSWER- A sound argument Which of these terms demonstrate when premises are true, and a conclusion is likely to be true, though not guaranteed, and provided sufficient evidence to lead us to conclude with confidence? - valid - sound - strong - weak - ANSWER- A strong Argument Which of these relies on an argument being strong first, and then also having true premises? - sound - cogent - uncogent - strong - ANSWER- A cogent argument 3 | P a g e What is the following an example of? All fruits are sweet. Tomatoes are fruit. Therefore tomatoes are sweet. - ANSWER- A deductive argument What is the following an example of? It looks like a duck. It also quacks like a duck. Therefore, it probably is a duck. - ANSWER- A inductive argument What is an argument that contains bad reasoning ? - weak argument - uncogent argument - fallacy - bias - ANSWER- A fallacy What is an argument that contains an invalid structure, and occurs in deductive reasoning? - fallacy - formal fallacy 4 | P a g e - informal fallacy - invalid argument - ANSWER- A formal fallacy What is an argument that contains bad content, and occurs in inductive reasoning? - fallacy - weak argument - informal fallacy - formal fallacy - ANSWER- A informal fallacy What is a formal fallacy that uses the following invalid structure ? If A, then C. C. Therefore, A. - ANSWER- Affirming the consequent What is a formal fallacy that uses the following invalid structure ? If A, then C. Not A. Therefore, not C. - ANSWER- Denying the antecedent